<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Entries tagged 'Xerox'</title>
		<description>Blog Entries tagged 'Xerox'</description>
		<link>http://www.nzmac.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:51:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Who owns what?</title>
			<link>http://www.nzmac.com/community-blog/27-who-owns-what.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm no Lawyer, but I do think that the &amp;quot;man in the street&amp;quot; has it over the lawyer in one respect. He or she has not had to study law and therefore some things are still &amp;quot;Common Sense&amp;quot; to him or her. What I hope to do in this &amp;quot;article&amp;quot; is demonstrate how fancy lawyers now claim to own the rights to some things that they patently (sic) do not own the rights to. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Firstly, The Open Group, a San Francisco company that claims ownership of the Unix tradema [...]</description>
			<author>bart@macservices.co.nz</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2003 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Xerox</category>
 <category>open source</category>
 <category>history</category>
 <category>development</category>
 <category>design</category>
 <category>Apple</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>